| 
 
 
 
 |  |  
 
 
 
        
          | teaching reading - comprehension |  
          | Many new college students have  difficulty reading and understanding academic literature – or even “quality”  journalistic writing (NYT, Harpers, New Yorker etc).  They may have a  limited vocabulary, lack the context they need to make sense of an argument or  be unaware of the conventions of argumentation.  Reading comprehension problems (click link for example) make discussion a non-starter  or wildly off-track, increase students dependence on the instructor or professor  for explanatory summaries (which do have a role) and block access to ideas.
 
		      Prepare students to read Help the students focus their reading All the following strategies help  prepare the students to read.  It's more teaching preparation, but usually  worth it in time saved trying to correct misunderstandings later.  
              
                |     | Studies have shown that student comprehension dramatically improves when they    have some idea of the subject being covered before they start    reading.  Consider the example of a professional scholar.     Professional scholars generally have wealth of knowledge of the background    issues and debates informing the author's argument before they start    reading.  This context informs their reading: it allows them to read    faster with more meaning and more pleasure.  Teachers can provide    students with some of this background knowledge.  They can fill in some    of the context before the students tackle the article - why and when    the article was published, the issues and debates informing the argument, the    positions other scholars have taken.
 |  
                |   | Provide the class with a verbal summary of the reading before they actually tackle it themselves. Professional scholars often have a pretty    good idea of what an author is going to say before they start reading.     This makes the reading easier and helps them focus on the key point the    author is trying to make.  While summarizing the reading draw the    students attention to the structure of the argument as well as the    content.  See here for an example    of how to do this.
 |  
                |   | Very often students don’t know, or have only a vague understanding of, the    meaning of words and concepts that end in -ology, -archy or –ism.  For    example, patriarchy, ideology, globalization, liberalism, individualism,    neoliberal, dichotomy, institution, binary, these are all words that require    an explanation.  And many of the articles and books assigned to    undergraduates are written with academic peers in mind, not an undergraduate    audience, and they assume a background theoretical understanding of, for    example, Marxist critiques of capitalism.  Before the students do the    reading briefly explain the key terms, write the definitions on the board and    make sure they write them down.  Then work them into a SUMMARY of the    article (see pre-reading summary above). The best way for students to become    familiar with a word or concept is to experience it in a meaningful    context.
 |  
                |     | Show the students how you read.  Read a (short) text out loud,    pull out the main point, rephrase what the author is saying, make a    connection to something else, evaluate the evidence, and dissect and critique    the language, the metaphors, and the implicit and explicit values and    assumptions.
 Show the students how to make notes on a text.  Students don't learn    to mark their textbooks at school and even when they do they often mark    examples or statistics or anecdotes, rather than the thesis and important    points.  Bring your text to class and share it with the students in all    its highlighted, underlined, arrowed and noted glory.  (If you are a    prolific over-marker skip this step, or use a specially prepared text that    doesn't intimidate the student.
 
 |  
                |   | Sensitize students to ideas or issues in upcoming reading.  Introduce    them to the ideas before they read them.  You can do this by taking a    quick survey of student opinion on an issue, or by playing a news-clip,    video-clip, or piece of music that deals with the same ideas.
 
 |    
              
                |     | Hand out a list of questions for the students to answer while    reading the article.  Aim to draw their attention to the most important    points - usually the thesis and supporting evidence.  Very often    students have a perfect recall of all the anecdotes in the piece but are    oblivious to, or misread the author’s argument.  Note: It's a good idea    to have the same reading questions show up in your pre-reading summary – see the example.  This is    a way to make sure that  
                      you aren't asking too many questionsyou’re asking questions you really care about. If the    questions can't fit into a five-minute pre-reading summary, they are probably    not important enough – not close enough to the central concerns of the    reading task |  
                |     | Have students write a brief of the article, a one to two paragraph    summary, or a bulleted list of the main arguments (studies show students    recall is much better when prose is abbreviated and rearranged in list    form).  This will encourage them to look for the thesis and will teach    them to distill a lot of waffle to the important points. Note:   
                      It is enough to have         the students pull out three or four important ideas.  The brief should lay         out the structure of the essay.  The students should be encouraged         to figure out how the author is structuring the argument.   The briefs should also be    critiqued.   The work done in class with the briefs should help the    students learn to do better briefs.   "Sarah,    look over your brief and find for me the one sentence that summarizes the key    idea of this article.  Because if it's    not there, that's a problem." "Julie,    you've certainly got the main point down – and you do a good job summarizing    two key points.  But as I listen to    your summary, it seems to me that you've left out an entire major point of    the piece.  In fact, looking over the    essay, it's like you ignored four pages in the middle.  Do you have any sense of where you    jumped?  Or why?"  Eventually, you'd hope to turn    this over to the students: "What    do you guys think of this brief?     Anything missing?" |  
                |     | Students are often assigned reading at the beginning of the semester which    is never again mentioned until it crops up on an exam.  The more    students are made aware of the relevance of assigned material to what they    are learning or trying to understand, the more likely they are to read    it.  The relevance of each piece to the course objectives, and to other    readings, needs to be made EXPLICIT by the teacher, not assumed to be    obvious.  This can be done in a couple of ways. 
                      Just say it.          "The reason this book / article is important is because it tells us         ______ about the problem of gender/race/class."  Make         connections between readings for students, help them see how they work         together to help us better understand an issue or problem.          "The  article you'll read for tomorrow makes a similar point         to the argument in Sinha's book but focuses more specifically on         ...." Talk about it.          Nothing causes a faster drop in student compliance with reading         assignments than not mentioning them.  The reading should come up         in lecture, it should be a starting point or reference for discussions.  |  |  
 |  | 
 
 
          
            | The Handbook  for Teachers further elaborates the course goals as helping  students develop the ability to: 
                Use flexible appropriate processes for writing, speaking and readingTo understand and use basic rhetorical concepts To write and speak analytically about controversies   (For a more detailed description  of these three related objectives see the Handbook, p3-4) |  |  |