Henry David Thoreau, Walden, “Brute Neighbors”
- What are some features of Thoreau’s style?
- What aspects of animal life does he seem to focus on? In what contexts
does he place the animals he describes?
- What animals does he choose to portray? Is there a meaning to the order
in which they are presented?
- What are some striking features of the description of the battle of
the ants? What is the purpose of the classical and historical comparisons
and the final description of the battle as occuring in the “Presidency of Polk”?
- What is added to the account by the fact that the narrator fails to
intervene in what he sees? Why do you think he doesn’t do so?
- Do you think it is likely that the loon was laughing at him? What qualities
does Thoreau ascribe to the bird?
- What final reflections on animal life might a reader of this essay be
expected to have?
- Are these points with which Emerson would have agreed? What are differences
in Thoreau’s mode of making his observations?
“Walking”
- What are some of the meanings of Thoreau’s statement, “in Wildness is the
preservation of the World”?
- What are some notable passages or aspects of Thoreau’s presentation? (e.
g., as in “I believe in the forest, and in the meadow, and in the night in which
the corn grows.”)
- What is the significance of Thoreau’s desire to turn houses backwards
to face the woods? (183)
- Which aspects of history and culture does he feel have been neglected?
(184) What has been the value of swamps and wildlands to earlier societies?
- Which forms of literature does he most value? Why is mythology more
valuable than later and more elaborated literatures?
- What kind of persons does Thoreau admire? (187) What does he mean by “wild
men,” and what forces attempt to break or tame them?
- What is the social value of individual differences and traits? (187)
Would this idea have needed expression in the 1860s? Is it still relevant?
- Does Thoreau seem to emphasize the same aspects of nature as had Wordsworth?
Ruskin? Emerson?
- What does Thoreau add to the discussion that we have not found in earlier
writers? How may some of his observations have reflected social changes between
1800 and 1860?