Questions for William Morris, "The Beauty of Life" (1880)

1. What is the occasion of Morris's address on "the beauty of life"? Can you tell from the essay what seem to have been the allegiances of his audience? Which aspects of his views might have been controversial, or even offended them?
2. What does Morris believe is the danger that faces civilization? (291) Why is this an especially pressing danger in the late 19th century?
3. What metaphors does Morris use to rouse his listeners to action? How would you describe his style?
4. What does Morris mean by "the beauty of life"? How is it related to "art" in the conventional high-cultural senses of the word?
5. What kind of "art" does Morris want? Is his the usual definition of art? Are there any new features of his definition?
6. What does Morris think was preferable about the art of the past? (293) What tendencies of Victorian life and artistic hierarchy does he deplore? (293, 295) In what sectors of society does he believe a more natural art lingered until close to the present? (295)
7. Do Morris's views of the relation of past labor to that of the present resemble those of Ruskin in "The Stones of Venice"? Do his views on the history of art and literature seem biased in favor of certain forms of art, and if so, which kinds? (296)
8. What are Morris's beliefs about industrial waste and pollution? (298, 304) Tearing down or gutting old buildings? (303) Trash? (305) Billboards and advertising? (305) Cutting down of old forest growth? (306) Would he have liked modern U. S. society?
9. What does Morris mean by calling for a "Century of Education"? (299) Why isn't it sufficient to find art in museums?
10. What kind of life does he believe will help prepare us for a day in which everyone can live in beautiful surroundings? (307-308) Do his ideas have any relevance to present-day American life?
11. How does Morris end his essay? (310) What does he call on his audience to do? (310)
12. Do you think this essay is effective as an example of social/political rhetoric, and if so, why?

"The Lesser Arts” (1878)

What is Morris’s tone in addressing his audience?

What are the “lesser arts”? Why have they been relegated to an inferior status, and what effect has this had on the creation of art? On society as a whole?

Where should we look for “art”? According to Morris, how can one judge whether something is beautiful or ugly? (Is this easy to determine?)

What would be the effect of an absence of pleasure in making and using decorative art? What change in “the curse of labor” would follow from freeing people to create art? 

Who have built the great monuments of history?

What changes in the nature of art have been brought about by the modern division of labor?

What will be the consequence of the death of some of the arts? If art should leave the world for a time, what would happen?

What does he call on his audience to do at present? What should be their attitude toward the land they inhabit?

What is the best method of education for a decorative artist? Why would this have needed emphasis at the time?

According to Morris, what is the relationship between a society’s art and its economic structure?

What change does he think is needed in the making of goods? Who is responsible for the making of inferior products, and what should be the remedy? What should be the foundation of a new taste, devoid of the craving for show and luxury?

What are some hypocrisies behind the respect for “fine art” at the expense of concern for other forms of beauty? What has happened to the landscape, air and water?

What are the consequences of the claim that “I do not want art for a few, any more than education for a few, or freedom for a few”? What ideals does he offer at the essay’s conclusion?

What forces may suggest that some of his ideals are possible? Would other nineteenth-century thinkers have agreed with him?

To what extent might Engels and Marx have agreed with these views? How are their approaches different from that of Morris?

“Art Under Plutocracy” (1883)

What are some differences of emphasis between this and the preceding essay?

To what audience is Morris speaking, and why does he find this topic especially urgent?

What does Morris believe is the danger that faces civilization? Why is this an especially pressing danger in the late 19th century? Would Marx have agreed?

What arguments does Morris use to rouse his listeners to action? How would you describe his style?

What does Morris mean by "art"? How does this broadened definition alter the scope of his concerns?

What does he criticize in the notion that those who fail economically are responsible for their plight?

What does Morris think was preferable about the art of the past? What tendencies of Victorian life and artistic/social hierarchy does he deplore?

According to Morris, what has been the result of the introduction of machine-driven manufacture? What should have been its effect?

What conditions of life for workers does Morris especially deplore?

Why does Morris associate “competitive commerce” with anarchy and war? What does he see as the workers’ sole alternative?

What should be our motive in desiring change?

How does Morris end his essay? What does he call on his audience to do? What will bring about the union of “a hundred million, and peace upon the earth”?

Do you think this essay is effective as an example of social/political rhetoric, and if so, why?

Morris and Marx were acquaintances and aware of each other’s ideas (Marx 1818-83; Morris 1834-96). What are some similarities in their approach to issues of social organization? Some differences? Do all of these share a belief in internationalism?

Questions for Walter Pater, The Renaissance

1. What does Pater mean by "the Renaissance"? (316) What may have been untraditional about this definition--chronologically and ideologically? What would the author of "The Nature of Gothic" have felt about this conception of Renaissance?
2. In the "Conclusion," what does Pater believe are chief features of modern philosophy, science, and life? Are these happy changes? Which of the authors we have read, if any, might have agreed with him?
3. What does Pater believe should be the goal of life? (319) What are some of the better ways of fulfilling these goals? (320)
4. How would you characterize Pater's style? In what ways does it resemble poetry?
5. Pater suppressed the "Conclusion" to his Renaissance under a barage of criticism. Why do you think this work might have been so controversial in its day?
6. Pater was also attacked--and later admired--as the father of impressionist and homoerotic criticism. Can you see evidence in these excerpts for these responses?

For a full set of questions, chapter by chapter, see Pater, The Renaissance.